<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Interview with Nick Glass</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wowlit.org/blog/2009/07/06/an-interview-with-nick-glass/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wowlit.org/blog/2009/07/06/an-interview-with-nick-glass/</link>
	<description>International Collection of Children's and Adolescent Literature</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 01:00:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Ann Marona</title>
		<link>http://wowlit.org/blog/2009/07/06/an-interview-with-nick-glass/comment-page-1/#comment-8047</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Ann Marona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wowlit.org/blog/?p=113#comment-8047</guid>
		<description>I understand, Nick.  Thanks for your reply.

Lee Ann</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand, Nick.  Thanks for your reply.</p>
<p>Lee Ann</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Glass</title>
		<link>http://wowlit.org/blog/2009/07/06/an-interview-with-nick-glass/comment-page-1/#comment-8046</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Glass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wowlit.org/blog/?p=113#comment-8046</guid>
		<description>Hi. Thanks for all your comments from this posting. I appreciate and value reading everyone&#039;s responses and thoughts.

Two specific responses to comments above. Janine about feeling a need to justify our decision. I&#039;ve never thought that way because I believe in the process too deeply. We worked hard, worked honestly, worked collaboratively -- and followed a process that I now know really works.  So no -- justification isn&#039;t in my vocabulary right now. I&#039;m proud and committed to these five books as our five most distinguished books of the year.

As for Lee Ann&#039;s question if I would name some personal favorite books that didn&#039;t make this list -- I might be allowed to publicly write them, but I&#039;d rather keep the focus on the work of our committee and not go there.  All of us on the committee had and discussed many titles that were worthy of serious consideration -- but we worked through them and identified clear, explained reasons why these books did not figuratively and literally stay on our table.  I&#039;d rather not delve into my own opinions about those books right now, if that&#039;s OK with you.

Thanks again, everyone. This has been a pleasure and valuable experience writing about these experiences.  My best,

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. Thanks for all your comments from this posting. I appreciate and value reading everyone&#8217;s responses and thoughts.</p>
<p>Two specific responses to comments above. Janine about feeling a need to justify our decision. I&#8217;ve never thought that way because I believe in the process too deeply. We worked hard, worked honestly, worked collaboratively &#8212; and followed a process that I now know really works.  So no &#8212; justification isn&#8217;t in my vocabulary right now. I&#8217;m proud and committed to these five books as our five most distinguished books of the year.</p>
<p>As for Lee Ann&#8217;s question if I would name some personal favorite books that didn&#8217;t make this list &#8212; I might be allowed to publicly write them, but I&#8217;d rather keep the focus on the work of our committee and not go there.  All of us on the committee had and discussed many titles that were worthy of serious consideration &#8212; but we worked through them and identified clear, explained reasons why these books did not figuratively and literally stay on our table.  I&#8217;d rather not delve into my own opinions about those books right now, if that&#8217;s OK with you.</p>
<p>Thanks again, everyone. This has been a pleasure and valuable experience writing about these experiences.  My best,</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joan Reichel</title>
		<link>http://wowlit.org/blog/2009/07/06/an-interview-with-nick-glass/comment-page-1/#comment-8045</link>
		<dc:creator>Joan Reichel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wowlit.org/blog/?p=113#comment-8045</guid>
		<description>Very interesting and professional discussion. Thank you for your dedication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting and professional discussion. Thank you for your dedication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Ann Marona</title>
		<link>http://wowlit.org/blog/2009/07/06/an-interview-with-nick-glass/comment-page-1/#comment-8044</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Ann Marona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wowlit.org/blog/?p=113#comment-8044</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the fascinating interview, Nick!

Are you at liberty to tell us the title of the book that you loved which was eliminated in Denver?   And what were some of your personal favorites that didn&#039;t make the list?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the fascinating interview, Nick!</p>
<p>Are you at liberty to tell us the title of the book that you loved which was eliminated in Denver?   And what were some of your personal favorites that didn&#8217;t make the list?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judi Moreillon</title>
		<link>http://wowlit.org/blog/2009/07/06/an-interview-with-nick-glass/comment-page-1/#comment-8043</link>
		<dc:creator>Judi Moreillon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wowlit.org/blog/?p=113#comment-8043</guid>
		<description>I cannot answer for Nick Glass, but I can answer for myself. I am currently serving on the Pura Belpré Award Committee (http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/alsc/awardsgrants/bookmedia/belpremedal/belpreabout/index.cfm). Just as “The Academy” does not have to justify Oscar winners, I do not believe book award committees should have to justify their selections.

As a committee, we are responding individually to the books we receive from publishers (and those we nominate on our own) while simultaneously applying the criteria and following procedures established by ALSC and REFORMA. We will discuss each book and some will rise to the top. A Belpré committee composed of different people would likely arrive at different decisions for the medal and honor winners. One or more members of our committee may choose to write about our process and selection, just as Nick is doing on this blog, but I hope we will not be asked to justify our choices per say.

I agree with you that selecting book award winners carries with it a great deal of responsibility. Still, I hope that people’s responses (and that includes those of children and youth) to literature are not compromised by concerns about justifying those responses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot answer for Nick Glass, but I can answer for myself. I am currently serving on the Pura Belpré Award Committee (<a href="http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/alsc/awardsgrants/bookmedia/belpremedal/belpreabout/index.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/alsc/awardsgrants/bookmedia/belpremedal/belpreabout/index.cfm</a>). Just as “The Academy” does not have to justify Oscar winners, I do not believe book award committees should have to justify their selections.</p>
<p>As a committee, we are responding individually to the books we receive from publishers (and those we nominate on our own) while simultaneously applying the criteria and following procedures established by ALSC and REFORMA. We will discuss each book and some will rise to the top. A Belpré committee composed of different people would likely arrive at different decisions for the medal and honor winners. One or more members of our committee may choose to write about our process and selection, just as Nick is doing on this blog, but I hope we will not be asked to justify our choices per say.</p>
<p>I agree with you that selecting book award winners carries with it a great deal of responsibility. Still, I hope that people’s responses (and that includes those of children and youth) to literature are not compromised by concerns about justifying those responses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janine Schall</title>
		<link>http://wowlit.org/blog/2009/07/06/an-interview-with-nick-glass/comment-page-1/#comment-8042</link>
		<dc:creator>Janine Schall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wowlit.org/blog/?p=113#comment-8042</guid>
		<description>Very interesting! I really look forward to reading the rest of this interview. I&#039;ve always been curious about the Newbery process--while I&#039;ve never thought a Newbery Award winner was a bad book, there have occasionally been times I&#039;ve thought there were more qualified books.

My question: I loved The Graveyard Book, but I know it was a controversial choice for some people. Does the committee (or do you) feel a need to justify the decision on this or on any other award winner? If so, how do you do this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting! I really look forward to reading the rest of this interview. I&#8217;ve always been curious about the Newbery process&#8211;while I&#8217;ve never thought a Newbery Award winner was a bad book, there have occasionally been times I&#8217;ve thought there were more qualified books.</p>
<p>My question: I loved The Graveyard Book, but I know it was a controversial choice for some people. Does the committee (or do you) feel a need to justify the decision on this or on any other award winner? If so, how do you do this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

